Webfire Themes Weebly Templates
    WEB3IOT.COM
    support@web3iot.com
    +44(0)7763264313
    • Home
    • About
    • Latest
      • Blog Posts
      • Industry News
      • Whitepapers
      • Industry Insight
      • Smart Products
    • Events
      • Conferences >
        • Conferences 2019
        • Conferences 2018
        • Conferences 2017
        • Conferences 2016
      • Meetups
      • Add Event
    • Products
      • 2018
      • 2017 >
        • March 2017
        • Feb 2017
        • Jan 2017
      • 2016 >
        • Dec 2016
        • Nov 2016
        • Oct 2016
        • Sept 2016
        • August 2016
        • July 2016
        • June 2016
        • May 2016
        • April 2016
        • March 2016
        • Feb 2016
        • Jan 2016
      • 2015 >
        • Dec 2015
        • Nov 2015
        • Oct 2015
        • Sept 2015
        • August 2015
        • July 2015
        • June 2015
        • May 2015
        • April 2015
        • March 2015
        • Feb 2015
        • Jan 2015
      • 2014 >
        • Dec 2014
        • Nov 2014
        • Oct 2014
        • Sept 2014
    • Contact
      • Newsletter
    • Social Media
      • Facebook
      • Google+
      • Instagram
      • LinkedIn
      • Periscope
      • Pinterest
      • Quora
      • Snapchat
      • Twitter
      • Vimeo
      • Vine
      • Youtube

    ICOs are funding the creation of a new decentralised web (PART III)

    9/21/2017

    Comments

     
    Post By Simon Montford on Sept 21, 2017
    Following on from part 1 and part 2 of this series, what I find most curious about the current ICO mania is that the majority of people filling their boots with crypto-plunder clearly understand the dangers, but do it anyway. Let's take EOS's ICO for example, if you look at the company's Terms of Use (TOU) you will see that the founders have sensibly made provisions to indemnify themselves against future liability.
    One of the most challenging aspects of accepting crypto-currency from investors is meeting Know Your Customer (KYC) provisions, so to minimise exposure anyone located in the US or China is prohibited from participating:

    "NO U.S. OR CHINESE BUYERS: EOS Tokens are not being offered or distributed to U.S. persons or Chinese persons do not purchase or attempt to purchase EOS Tokens". 

    Furthermore, to ensure their tokens cannot be regarded by regulators as securities, they clearly disclose that they do not offer holders any rights or benefits: 

    "EOS TOKENS HAVE NO RIGHTS, USES OR ATTRIBUTES. The EOS Tokens do not have any rights, uses, purpose, attributes, functionalities or features, express or implied, including, without limitation, any uses, purpose, attributes, functionalities or features on the EOS Platform. Company does not guarantee and is not representing in any way to Buyer that the EOS Tokens have any rights, uses, purpose, attributes, functionalities or features. 

    NOT A PURCHASE OF EOS PLATFORM TOKENS. EOS Tokens purchased under this Agreement are not tokens on the EOS Platform. Buyer acknowledges, understands and agrees that Buyer should not expect and there is no guarantee or representation made by Company that Buyer will receive any other product, service, rights, attributes, functionalities, features or assets of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, any cryptographic tokens or digital assets now or in the future whether through receipt, exchange, conversion, redemption or otherwise".


    Yet people are still prepared to fall over themselves to buy EOS tokens in good faith! Don't get me wrong, I am not suggesting EOS is a scam - I have huge respect for Dan Larimer and his team. I totally understand the reasons for their counterintuitive approach, and why people are willing to participate, but I just find the dynamic curious and fascinating. Let me try to explain. 

    What appears to be happening is, out of necessity to comply with regulation, contract law is being trumped by contextual law. What I mean is that a tacit understanding has been formed en masse between EOS and its token holders. This understanding is based on a collective implicit implied agreement that takes precedence over the company's TOUs, at least in the eyes of the investors, otherwise why would they be willing to buy EOS tokens? 

    This legal dynamic is prevalent in high context societies such as China where people rely on guanxi to enable them to enter into agreements based on implicit understanding. As a result they tend not to rely on the need to codify written agreements, instead opting for what we in the west, call a psychological contract.

    It is my view that EOS is taking a similar approach as an ingenious way of circumventing regulation whereby investors agree to EOS's TOU on a kind of wink wink nudge nudge basis. Outwardly they agree that EOS tokens won't entitle them to "receive any other product, service, rights, attributes, functionalities, features or assets of any kind whatsoever", but due to the psychological agreement they believe that they do in fact own a share of the company's future success in the form of a security, but that doesn’t actually exist, or does it? Do you get my drift? To say this is a legal grey area is an understatement! 

    The EOS crowdsale continues to raise money and will do so for the rest of the year. The plan is to release 2m tokens each day that will result in the issue of 900m tokens (100m will be kept by the company), so a company that has no income and no product could soon be worth around $1bn! 

    In theory the founders could do whatever they like with the proceeds of their ICO, and technically they wouldn't be breaking the law. Disclaimer; I'm not a lawyer, so this is my understanding based on nothing but guesswork and conjecture.

    What I find incredibly ironic is that one of the greatest benefits of blockchain technology is that the system was designed to be trustless. Yet in the world of ICOs trust continues to be as important as ever.

    Unlike the rule of written law, psychological agreements particularly between strangers are very fragile. If there was a collective loss of faith people would stop buying tokens, and rather than hold they would panic sell. This would then lead to a total meltdown.    

    All booms start with a fear of losing out, and all busts are caused by panic selling caused by fear, uncertainty and doubt. It happened in Holland with Tuplip mania in 1637, Britain when the Spanish opened trading routes to the British in 1720, then again after the Napoleonic Wars in 1825 after Latin American trading routes were opened. Further examples include British railroad mania in 1840, the great American Depression in 1929, the dotcom bubble in 2001, and the global financial banking crisis of 2007. 

    I would argue however that the boom and bust cycle is a necessary evil and therefore so is the current ICO craze. Without speculators the new world would never have been discovered, railroads would never have been built, and the car and computer industries wouldn't exist today. All the money lost by speculators who invested in failed dot com companies wasn't in vain. Like the railroads, it resulted in a global communications infrastructure that we all collectively benefit from today. Perhaps if the global financial crisis hadn't happened, the need for a decentralised currency would not have been so obvious. Like seasons of the year, the boom-bust cycle will continue in perpetuity, therefore it is only a matter of time until there will be a major cypto correction. Sadly people will lose money from investing in ICOs, but on the upside they will be making a noble contribution towards the creation of a new decentralised web that humanity will ultimately benefit from.

    Read More: ICOs are funding the creation of a new decentralised web (Part I)
    ​


    Disclaimer:

    I do not provide personal investment advice and I am not a qualified licensed investment advisor. All information found here, including any ideas, opinions, views, predictions, forecasts, commentaries, suggestions, expressed or implied herein, are for informational, entertainment or educational purposes only and should not be construed as personal investment advice. While the information provided is believed to be accurate, it may include errors or inaccuracies. I will not and cannot be held liable for any actions you take as a result of anything you read here. Conduct your own due diligence, or consult a licensed financial advisor or broker before making any and all investment decisions. Any investments, trades, speculations, or decisions made on the basis of any information found on this site, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.





    Comments

      Categories

      All
      3D Printing
      5G
      Analysis
      Appcessories
      Artificial Intelligence
      Blockchain
      Business
      Conferences
      Crowdfunded
      Drones
      Entrepreneurs
      EOS
      Ethereum
      Fashion
      Fitness
      For Sale
      Funding
      Hackathons
      Hardware
      Health Monitoring
      Health Tech
      ICO
      Indiegogo
      Industrial IoT
      IOTA
      IoT Events
      IOT Starter Kits
      Kickstarter
      M2M
      NEO
      News
      Preorder
      Robotics
      Security
      Smart City
      Smart Home
      Smart Office
      Smart Watches
      Startup Funding
      Startups
      Tech For Athletes
      Tech For Kids
      Tech For Makers
      Tech For Pets
      Tech For Seniors
      Transport
      Venture Capital
      VR/Augmented Reality
      Wearables

      Authors

      Simon Montford

      SOCIAL MEDIA

      © Simon Montford (5350 Ltd & WEB3IOT), 2014, 2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Simon Montford and WEB3IOT with appropriate and specific direction to the original content at web3iot.com.

      Archives

      April 2018
      February 2018
      December 2017
      September 2017
      March 2017
      January 2017
      November 2016
      October 2016
      September 2016
      July 2016
      June 2016
      May 2016
      April 2016
      March 2016
      February 2016
      January 2016
      December 2015
      November 2015
      October 2015
      July 2015
      June 2015
      May 2015
      April 2015
      March 2015
      February 2015
      January 2015
      December 2014
      November 2014
      October 2014
      September 2014

      RSS Feed



    CONTACT US

    OUR MISSION

    We aim to help the IOT ecosystem by connecting hardware and software professionals, academics, entrepreneurs, enthusiasts, hobbyists, investors, and early-adopters. We believe the "Maker Revolution" will lead to incredible innovations that will enrich the lives of millions of consumers and employees throughout the world.

    OUR FOCUS

    Anything relating to the Internet of Things including drones, wearables and connected devices of every kind. The IOT will increasingly affect us all as smart devices become ubiquitous in the home, work place and within industry. We aim to help hardware startup entrepreneurs promote their products, and deliver news about anything IOT-related.

    COMPANY INFO

    86-90 Paul Street    
    London                           
    EC2A 4NE                        United Kingdom          

    support@web3iot.com  

    CONTACT US

    78 West Port
    Edinburgh
    EH1 2LE
    ​United Kingdom

    +44(0)7763264313

    NEWSLETTER offers and promotions

      Please enter your name and email. You can “unsubscribe” at any time!
    SUBSCRIBE

     CATEGORIES

    Drones
    Home
    Smartwatch
    Fitness
    Smart Home
    IOT Starter Kits
    Smart Cities
    Wearables
    Makers & Hackers
    Hardware

    © Simon Montford 5350 Ltd 2014, 2015 all rights reserved
    HOME | ABOUT | RESOURCES | NEWS | CONTACT | TOS
    Back to top
    ✕